Spatiotemporal Graphical Neural Networks for the GLSL Maritime Corridor

Author

Igor Sadoune

Context

GLSL Maritime Corridor

Key Points:

  • The maritime space of the Great Lakes St. Lawrence region (GLSL) is a critical infrastructure
    • Although the GLSL maritime corridor represents a small portion of the overall regional economy, it is an irreplaceable transport mode for many commodities
    • Its growth potential is enormous

Problem

External Pressure

External Pressures

Internal Challenges

  • Port network is decentralized as firms rent terminals to ports
  • Port authorities manage demand and port calls locally in a decentralized manner
  • → Lack of centralized logistics for port calls

The Graph and Network Theory Approach

What is a graph?

A graph is a mathematical structure consisting of:

  • A set of nodes: Each node represents a port
  • Node features: Deadweight distribution, port calls, ship type distribution, centrality, closeness, betweenness, PageRank, average dwell time, ship draft distribution, traveling time distribution, speed distribution
  • Edges: A matrix representing the connections between nodes in terms of a certain metric. In our case, we use a weighted score of deadweight tonnage, trip count, and frequency to weight, or give a score of importance to each edge connecting nodes.

Example

Direct Graph Network

Why is it best to think in terms of networks?

  • Grasps the structure
  • Understand interdependencies and optimize resource allocation
  • Flexible, a graph is a model that can evolve
  • Allows for node prediction, edge prediction, and counterfactual analysis

Expected Outputs

Node Prediction:

“How many port calls should we expect in Montreal for the next period?”

Edge Prediction:

“How many trips should we expect between Montreal and Quebec for the next period?”

Counterfactual Analysis:

What network representation allows us to do better than any other model like pure time series forecasting:

“What happens if port X closes? How could its load be redirected?”

“What happens if average draft decreases by 10% in port X in terms of deadweight capacity?”

Interactive 3D Network Visualization

Graphical Neural Networks (GNNs)

Training Set

graph TB
    subgraph Training["Training Set (Time Series of Graphs)"]
        T0["t=0<br/>Graph"]
        T1["t=1<br/>Graph"]
        dots["⋮"]
        Tn["t=n<br/>Graph"]
        T0 --> T1
        T1 --> dots
        dots --> Tn
    end
    
    Training -->|Input| GNN["Temporal GNN<br/>Model"]
    
    GNN --> Out1["Node Level<br/>Prediction"]
    GNN --> Out2["Edge Level<br/>Prediction"]
    GNN --> Out3["Counterfactual<br/>Analysis"]
    
    style Training fill:#e1f5ff
    style GNN fill:#ffe1e1
    style Out1 fill:#e1ffe1
    style Out2 fill:#e1ffe1
    style Out3 fill:#e1ffe1

Preliminary Results

Conterfactual Scenario: Removing Montreal from the Graph

Why Counterfactual Analysis is More Valuable Than Forecast?

  • Time series can forecast future trends based on historical data
  • Networks and graphs encode deeper information, the structure, and therefore are, in a sense, volume-agnostic (e.g., the volume traded in the GLSL maritime corridor can drastically change because of shocks, but the efficiency of a network representation is not impactedd by the shock)

Current Limitations and Perspectives

  • Some structural variables at port level are missing (but to be included): equipment, terminal capacity, workforce, etc.
  • Data on the commodities being transported are missing; this would help generate counterfactual scenarios based on shocks related to a specific industry
  • We need more certainty about when a ship is empty or not
  • This kind of model needs to be continuously updated with fresh data
  • Graph sparcity needs to be further improved
  • The learned graph structure will serve as a training environment for artificial agents (Reinforcement Learning)
    • RL agents can learn in the actual learned graph structure from AIS data or on conterfactual graphs